Okay that's deep
The test of a man is to control his sight and the test of a woman is to resist not being seen, because men are eager to look and women are eager to be seen.
I can't relate to any of this because the seasons in my country are dry and rain. But don't worry, it's fun.
God invented winter so girls could exchange body heat
not enough aang and gyatso out there...
I like the clannibal one, it's so sad in the film they don't get their happy ending together :'
NBC Hannibal was romantic because Hannibal Lecter and Will Graham saw each other and silently agreed that "You are sick, yet I will love you. You are sick but I will ingest you into my system and it will cause me a great deal of pain but I will not care. Loving you is never dirty work."
I don't like it about Beverly either and Miriam Lass is actually Clarice too. And I hate the fact that the show make Hannibal like unstoppable, he got caught only because he let the police catch him because Will reject him. It's felt abdurd to me. They show us that police in there is stupid.
And I like the book one it's show that Will is smart enough to catch Hannibal despite him got stabbed. Both of them actually.
It’s a well worn trope at this point: a woman, her gun, and the killer. There’s nothing wrong with that, really - but how a thing is done matters as much as what is done.
So let’s compare and contrast. Beverly’s discovery of Hannibal’s nightmare basement is a clear homage to Clarice Starling in Silence of the Lambs. But there are a few important differences.
I think people forget that the situation in Silence of the Lambs was out of Starling’s control. She didn’t run in half-cocked trying to cowboy her way into a serial killer’s den - she shows up to ask him routine questions and he runs off. Her choices make sense in context. She has to pursue him, both as an officer of the law and because she knows the clock is ticking on Catherine Martin’s life. So she does, and she emerges a triumphant hero. She descends into hell and walks right back out again.
On Hannibal, however, Beverly Katz is not behaving in a way that makes sense. Katz - who has been shown to be both brilliant and level-headed - goes to a suspected serial killer’s house in the middle of the night, by herself, and breaks in. She doesn’t tell anyone where she’s going. She dies trying to get evidence that she couldn’t even use because it was obtained illegally.
It’s absurd. Are we really to believe that rational, calm Beverly Katz would behave like this? It disrespects both the intelligence of the character and of the audience.
The saddest thing is that Katz could have easily been Hannibal’s Clarice Starling. She was the perfect candidate to take Hannibal Lecter down - uninvolved in his bullshit, clear-eyed, and formidable. Instead her arc has been cut off right as it was getting good. She was thrown away for a cheap shock that wasn’t actually a shock at all. What a waste.
no matter the struggles there is always ao3 in bed
TW for canon typical invincible violence but Me when bad dads and Adrienne lenker
Hypocrisy
‘Starling had the psychology background- Mapp’s was law- yet it was Mapp who knew that the washing machine’s rhythm was like a great heartbeat and the rush of its waters was what the unborn hear- our last memory of peace’ -Thomas Harris, The Silence of the Lambs
Final post of the year! :) I’ve always loved the imagery of Starling using the laundry room as a safe space to sit and think. I posted this on my instagram too (same @) with some more details <3
Reginald Dwayne Betts, from Felon; Poems; "Temptation of the Rope"
[Text ID: The link between us all / is tragedy,]