If Only I Could Get Jack Antonoff Drunk And Convince Him I Can Keep A Secret I Would Know EVERYTHING

I might or might not be crying right now.

So, aparently and according to Closer, Travis is having doubts about Taylor and their relationship. The articule says he still loves her but the public talking about how they may be pr and the rumour about her marriage with Joe (that is confirmed by Tree Pain to not be true) are messing with him.

The articule is very detailed, almost as if they read the mind of Kelce, and I cannot help but ask, how would they know? What I am trying to say is, this really looks like they are trying to craft a narrative around their relationships. The magazine is most likely not making that up, but been told by sources from Taylor and Travis team.

This is all really campy and reminds me of the Tom Hiddleston pre-reputation pr stunt, and it completely makes sense for them to do that.

If we take a closer look to Taylors public persona during the re recording era, she really tried and recreate her public dating life for the time of the albums original release when the re recording was going to be released. Previously to Speak Now TV she dated Matty Healy, a really cuestionable guy that swifties dont like. Pre 1989TV release she started being a lot more public with friends and starting dating Kalce out of the blue, which really draws paralels to her girlsquad and her relationship with Harry Styles or Calvin Harris, I am not really sure which one she might be recreating (and maybe Kelce is the mix of both Styles and Harris).

Now, in the pre reputation era, and if this pattern is not me reading a lot into her every move, it makes a lot of sense that Kelce has now gone from the character of Styles/Harris of 1989 to the Tom Hiddleston of reputation, all public and unashamed.

I dont know where she is going with all this public performances she is making, and maybe Travlor is a real, genuine, happy relationship (which good for her because everyone deserves true, happy, genuine love) but that is my take on it.

Hits diferent (HD) and I dont wanna live forever (IDWLF) might as well just be the same song separated in two.

Both of them have the same themes and imaginary. Both are about a girl deeply heartbroken that tries to party away the pain of the break up and then cries when it doesnt work.

Now, being stated that, we know that the songs on the midnight album are song that Taylor write in different times of her life, and noticing the similarities between HD and IDWLF, it only makes sense to think they were written at the exact same time, about the same situation and muse.

I know that IDWLF is a song for a film, but it can still apply to Taylors life and sitution, since she has stated that she writes from a personal experience. Maybe the song was intended to fit the plot of the movie but she probably took some of her own felings and experiences and putted them into it.

Also, both of them fit the narrative of 1989. She was out and about, partying eith the girlies and all the stuff and she was also heartbroken (like she stated in the vault tracks).

Now, I am about to dive into swifgron, so if you dont like it, I suggest you to stop reading now.

Taylor posted this video:

She made sure we wached the bunny. She even looked at the screen (with 0 discrepcion, may I add) to make sure it was there. You know whos nickname was bunny, you are right, Dianna Agron.

For the propose of this theory, I will take that as a confirmation that IDWLF is about Dianna (if people can make the case for ATW being about Jake because of a scarf or all 1989 about Harry for a few pap pictures, I guess we will have no problem making the case for Dianna and IDWLF based on that video).

Then, if IDWLF is basically the same song as HD (based on the parallels of their lyrics and all the stuff I pointed before) and if IDWLF muse is Dianna Agron then we could that Hits different is about Dianna Agron.

Thats it. Thats all I have to say today.

Disclaimer: this is just my interpretation and by sharing this I am not saying this is the truth or that Taylor said that to me or something like that. I am just reading and analising the art and content she putted out there.

Just seen a post about not tagging your gaylor publications with the Taylor Swift tag so you dont get trouble, and I completely respect that. Is a great way to avoid problems with hetlors and people that only what to spread hate.

However, I am a Taylor Swift fan. My post is about Taylor Swift. I made post about Taylor, her art and her public performances. I have the right to use the Taylor Swift tag and I will (but it is perfectly okay not to use it to avoid hetlors and stuff).

Just because the analisys I have doesnt aling with the mayority of the fandom doesnt mean is less valid or punisheable. Seing and pointing out the flagging is not harmful, the queer flagging is there for a reason (and most definitely, on propouse).

My gaylor post are about Taylor Swift like are the ones about Travlor and Haylor (and they all have the same speculative nature), so I have the right to use the Taylor Swift tag as much as I want without getting any hate

"do you seriously think you're above the rules" the stupid ones yeah

Not socialist in a “I won’t have to work” type of way but socialist in a “I’ll still be working but I won’t be worried I won’t make the rent” type of way. In a “billions won’t be hoarded by one person” type of way. In a “janitors, fast-food workers, child care workers, preschool teachers, hotel clerks, personal care and home health aides, and grocery store cashiers, will live comfortably” type of way. In a “the sick and elderly will be cared for” type of way. In a “no child should work” type of way.

Reblog if you think it’s okay to platonically say “I Love You” to your friends

Sooo, Bridgerton just came out (quite literally, with two Canon queer chatacters) and people are mad about it?? Like wtf??? Is 2024, get over it???

And they are saying they love the books so they dont want the storylines and shit changed. Mind you, the show has been changing the original storylines all the time, is an adaptation. Pretty sure the ones claiming to love the books have not even read them, but that is not relevant to the point I am trying to make.

What I am saying is that if you do not care about the series changing the history lines all the time, like they have been doing ALL OF THE SEASONS, ALL OF THE TIME, but you suddenly start to care -or hate- when a new history line (or a change of the story, like the Michael-Michaela one) only if it involves queer people, that is homophobic.

You only care when queer people are added. You only say its bad when queer people are represented. You only hate changes when queerness is involved.

THATS HOMOPHOBIA. Argue with the wall.

If you are anxious about your exams just think that a man has done it before you and aced it. It is not that hard. You will be fine.

Reblog if you think a woman can be complete without children

Y’ALL HAVE TIME TO REBLOG THIS. IT TAKES LESS THAN FIVE SECONDS.