Always making sure his boyfriend’s head is off the ground 💔
they werent lying! those basterds sure are inglourious!
"Old friend" is a gayass thing to call someone
Old picture. The AGS vibe I need
Thinking about the Holmes story where a blind girl goes to him and is like "My fiancé is missing and he kept telling me the week leading up to his disappearance that he would always love me and come back for me,were anything to happen so I think he knew he was in trouble and I love him so much and I'm going to wait for him but I'd like to find him faster,ya know?" And Holmes figures out that it was this girl's parents to scam her out of money she was owed from an estate which she gave to them because she was still living at home,which she wouldn't be if she ever married,so her step father PRETENDED TO DATE HER for MONTHS to keep her from ever getting engaged to a real person and when Holmes finds out he confronts this man and this man is like "Well,you caught me! But it wasn't illegal:) so:)" and Holmes is like "No,but it was sickening and cruel and if she had a brother or good male friend he should post you up and whip you but she doesn't." And the man is like "No,she doesn't." And does the Victorian version of sticking his tongue out and Holmes is like "Well,I guess I'll do then!" And HE PULLS OUT HIS HUNTING WHIP.
Interpreting Marius from an historical angle with consideration of the values of ancient Rome and Renaissance Italy is valid.
Interpreting Marius from the angle of the author’s intentions and statements about him is valid.
Interpreting Marius from the angle of gothic romance/gothic horror is valid.
Interpreting Marius from the angle of 21st century values and modern social politics is valid (and can be very interesting!).
Preferring one or several of these interpretations to others is valid.
Behaving like having/preferring a certain interpretation of a literary character is morally superior or morally reprehensible is, actually, a bit of a dick move.
And also, sorry to say this, but… the interpretation of a person who has read all available canon material about a character, will always be more valid than that of people who have not. If you want to discuss the books, you have to actually read them. And yes, of course this takes time, but it’s not hard to contextualize interpretations and statements with a sentence like “I have only read books x and y at this point" or even to say "I don't feel like I know enough to give a balanced interpretation on this yet."
what do you mean this is not how their dynamic works in the movies? [insp.]
not on here much but if interested you can find me on Twitter as @botticelli4ngel :)
152 posts