I Love It When You Read Multiple Works From A Writer And You Start Being Able To Pick Out The Things

This user supports AO3

This user is anti-censorship

This user believes in “don’t like, don’t read”

This user believes in “ship and let ship”

This user believes that fiction tastes and preferences do not dictate moral character

#the real reason geralt has two swords isn’t because he’s a witcher (it’s obviously for bard-and-sorceress reasons)

Um this woman is living the dream

very theon greyjoy core, thank u

—On Love, Marina Tsvetaeva

[text ID: I just want a humble, murderously simple thing: that a person be glad when I walk into the room.]

I wish everyone would admit that classic literature is inherently difficult to read, and that you shouldn’t feel stupid if you don’t “get it”. Especially the dark academia/ classic lit fandoms and stuff. Like unless you have the vocabulary and pop culture knowledge of an 18th century nobleman, it’s going to be a tough read. It’ll take you longer to read; you’re not stupid if you’ve spent several months on a single book! And you don’t have to enjoy everything. It’s okay if you got bored after one chapter of Wuthering Heights, and couldn’t be bothered to read the rest. It’s okay if you want to read your favourite kids book for the 10th time instead. You’re not stupid. No piece of literature is inherently better, more “important”, more “meaningful”, or more “intellectual” than another. First and foremost, read what brings you joy.

two days ago I read about echolalia; now I can only remember that when I first watched arrow every time there was any silence all I could do was say ‘you have fail this city’ on a loop for week

explaining the flash to people who have never seen it be like

Ugh, hate when people kiss me in the face.

Literally punch me, just DO NOT kiss me; meanwhile, my family insists on kissing my face everyday before I go they go to sleep, like WHY

so. i was wondering what this reminded me of:

and then i remembered it’s this: