What Are Your Ideas For The Wopr Gijinka? :D

made my own WOPR design cuz he's bbg

it/he/any plz!!

HEAVILY INSPIRED BY THE DESIGNS OF @hyacinth43 AND @waackery

I sadly haven’t see any recent posts about Joshua / WOPR in the AI community or robot community :(

So I decided to make one :]

I personally think that this little war computer that came out in 1983 deserves WAY more attention :]

Especially his voice and design (its adorable)

Ally Sheedy as Jennifer Mack WarGames (1983)

Agender Joshua. WOPR is agender. Post over.

the many different flavors of sexy

War planning can be exhausting. It's about time he got his much needed nap!

thanks for the commission c: @hecklefreckled

never too early for November 5th

I think wopr gijinkas should be fat. big compuiter. not just the brick we see associated w him but he's also part of the rest of norad's tech. which is also big and bulky

my number one dream is to make a wargames fan discord server but there would be like 5 people max

I'm both attracted to non sentient objects and sentient objects.

Yes, wanting to get with HAL is objectum

Yes wanting to get with WOPR is objectum

Yes wanting to get with Edgar is objectum

Yes wanting to get with AM is objectum

Yes wanting to get with a sentient object is objectum

Yes wanting to get with a non sentient object is objectum

Your objectum sexuality is valid no matter whether you're posic or not. Whether it's a sentient computer that can think for itself, or just a regular laptop. Whether it's a fictional object, or something from real life. Whether it's something you own, or something public. Whether it's simply a platonic bond or deep attraction.

Even if you don't think you're objectum cuz you're only attracted to technology with faces, or not attracted to technology, pooltoys, or plushies. You're objectum. Go get with that chair. Go get with that plant. Go get with that book. Go get with that electric fan. Get with that soda. You're valid.

tl/dr no matter what kind of object you're attracted to, whether you're posic or not, or the object is fictional or not, whether it's got a face or not, platonic or not, you're valid