It Is The End Of The Month Of Chaith And I've Been Working On A Chaiti Geet. I've Finally Completed It

Ofcourse I know all the Adityas are not the Sun. They all represent different aspects in nature. Like Varun is rain and water, Pushan is nourishment, Mitra is wind.

And since you brought up nakshatras, I think I should mention that some of the constellations do have stars which have a planetary system of their own. So these stars act as the sun of these planetary systems. Cancer has 55 Cancri with 5 planets, for example.

And like you pointed out, some of these adityas are nakshatra deities. So similarly couldn't these stars in the zodiac constellation can also be the suns with a planetary system.

I have been wondering about this for a while now.

So there are 12 Adityas, not all of them are the Sun but what if they are. Like we know, Surya Dev is the sun in our solar system and that there are other solar systems in our galaxy and the universe, so what if the other Adityas are also the Sun in their solar systems?

They are not similar to sun. It's because they have been mentioned as rulers of different nakshatras in Jyotish which has different characteristics.

For example, Varuna rules shatabhisha nakshatra. Shatabhisha is closely associated with scientific invention/innovation or breaking boundaries whereas Sun ruled nakshatras are related to authority/power.

We Hindus use aditya as synonymous to sun. I guess that's where this misconception comes from. Adityas are simply the children of aditi. They all have different characteristics.

Also, solar system and galaxies are modern scientific constructs. Our Hindu scriptures doesn't mention galaxies. So adityas are universal.

From an astrology perspective, there are many planetary combinations and aspects that can lead to disability.

The one that I can remember right now says that, if you have Saturn(or an aspect from Saturn) in the 5th house, which represents your children, means you'd have a child with disability. So, it doesn't have to be your past life karma, it could be your parents'.

I have a question for hindublr!!! :>

How common actually is the belief that disabled people are disabled for sins in past lives?

I read it in an "intro to hinduism" type book I picked up, but as a disabled person it really doesn't sit right with me and I kind of doubt it's that common of an belief?

Ty for your perspectives :3

The last image is the one for me.

I followed him when he started posting about vishnu sahasranamam verses associated with each nakshatra and honestly since then I've been learning a LOT. But man today is angry angry

When Peace Becomes a Wound: India, Terrorism, and the Weight of Restraint

I’ve always believed in peace. I still do. I don’t dream of war. I don’t find glory in bloodshed. And I certainly don’t believe revenge heals grief. But what happens when the very peace you’re protecting is the reason you keep losing your people? What happens when the other side doesn’t believe in peace at all?

This blog isn’t written out of hatred. It’s written out of heartbreak, confusion, and the raw frustration of watching the same pattern play on loop - a terrorist attack, innocent lives lost, silence from the world, and once again, India is told to be “mature,” “calm,” and “restrained.”

How many Pulwamas? How many Pahalgams? How many coffins wrapped in our tricolour will it take before the world understands that peace without accountability is just a pause before the next tragedy?

India has tried. Again and again. Diplomatic talks, bilateral agreements, backchannel negotiations, and yet, terrorist camps continue to thrive across the border. How long are we expected to act like it’s not happening? And more importantly, why must we always be the ones trying?

Yes, I am anti-war. Yes, I believe in dialogue. But don’t confuse that with weakness. Because defending your people is not the opposite of peace ,it is the very foundation of it. What India did with Operation Sindoor wasn’t about revenge. It was about drawing a line , a line that should’ve been drawn long ago.

And let's address the said "diplomatic peace mediation" : the hypocrisy of international response. IMF loans flowing into a country that has harboured, sheltered, and at times even celebrated known terrorists. Social media giants gag Indian voices calling out terrorism, but conveniently stay silent when the hate flows the other way. Neutrality? Really? Or is it just comfortable indifference?

No, I don’t hate Pakistani civilians. I never will. But I will not pretend that both sides are equally innocent. I will not chant "peace" if it comes at the cost of more Indian blood. Because that’s not peace. That’s surrender.

India has done enough. Now, India is doing what it must. And if the world won’t understand that , maybe it never really cared.

I write this as someone who aches every time a soldier doesn’t return home. As someone who still wants peace , but not the kind that requires us to die for it.

Jai hind 🇮🇳

The reason why the world doesn't know about all this, is because we don't talk enough about it. It's only on our regional media. We need it out there on global platforms. We slide it under the carpet thinking communal peace will be disturbed, the gap between hindus and muslims will widen. But we don't ask questions. We don't hold them accountable. These acts should have repercussions. Well it's happening now.

And yet half of our population is busy wanting to be "secular" and ignoring the current attacks and the past and the history of India too.

Indian Army neutralises Lashkar-e-Taiba terrorists

"Indian government is fascist Hindutva"

Meanwhile India neutralises notorious Islamist terrorists from Lashkar-e-Taiba.

Let's see what kind of crimes against humanity have these terrorists committed.

1998 Wandhama massacre where 23 Kashmiri Pandits (Hindus for those who don't know) were murdered

2000 Chittisinghpura massacre where 35 Sikhs were murdered

2000 Amarnath Yatra pilgrimage massacre, where over 100 people were murdered, mostly Hindu pilgrims and 7 Muslim shop keepers.

2002 Kaluchak massacre where eleven army children died in the attack, including a two-month-old girl, after terrorists dressed in counterfeit army uniforms hijacked a tourist bus

2003 Nadimarg massacre where 24 Kashmiri Pandits were murdered. The terrorists had dressed up in counterfeit Indian army uniforms to lure in their victims, promising them safety, before shooting them in execution style. This massacre was referred in the Indian film The Kashmir Files

2005 Delhi bombings, where 60 people were killed, including children, and 527 maimed. The bombings happened when people were preparing for Diwali.

2006 Varanasi bombings, where 37 people were killed and 90 were maimed.

2006 Doda massacre, where 34 unarmed Hindus, mostly shepherds , and even a 3-year-old child, were murdered in the state of Jammu & Kashmir by terrorists who were wearing counterfeit army uniforms.

2008 Mumbai attacks (26/11 attack) where 175 people were massacred and over 300 injured. Terrorist Ajmal Kasab admitted that the Pakistan Army and ISI were behind Lashkar-e-Taiba. The terrorists had come with fake IDs that had Hindu names, and they were wearing Hindus sacred thread in order to blend in. Indian leftist /secularist propagandists were ready to blame Hindutva for the attack but thanks to police officer Tukaram Omble (hutatma) who had caught Kasab alive that terrorists' plan was thwarted.

2017 Amarnath Yatra pilgrimage massacre (AGAIN), where 8 Hindu pilgrims were murdered.

2024 Reasi massacre, where Islamist LeT terrorists opened fire on a passenger bus transporting Hindu pilgrims who were on their way to pray to Goddess Vaishno Devi. Nine pilgrims, including a two-year-old and a 14-year-old were killed and 41 pilgrims were injured.

2025 Pahalgam massacre, where terrorists massacred Hindu men after asking their religion, checking their genitalia and looking at IDs. They left the Hindu women alive to "send message to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi".

I 100% support Hindutva. All Islamist Jihadists who are acting innocent and dressing up in an anti-fascist cloak to demand "Free Kashmir", our Hindutva government will send you to Jahannum.

framing hindus as colonizers vs muslims/arabs has to be even dumber than saying jews are not indigenous to the levant.

…do you know how old hinduism is?

“colonizers framing themselves as the oppressed so they don’t have to atone for their crimes told me the actual oppressed are oppressors so i’m just going to believe it without question.”

get a grip 😂 the earth is flat too, right?

people who know history: so arab colonization—

morons on the internet:

Patriotism doesn’t mean blind agreement with everything your country does , agreed. But it also doesn’t mean selectively weaponizing “secularism” to silence the majority, especially when the very identity, safety, and history of that majority is under constant attack. There’s a growing frustration among Hindus, and it’s not without reason. When blood is spilled, when 26 Hindu pilgrims are massacred in cold blood , and the outrage is met not with solidarity, but with lectures on “secularism,” something is deeply wrong.

India is constitutionally a secular state. That means the government must not favor any religion. Yet, time and again, “secularism” has been interpreted not as neutrality, but as appeasement , often at the expense of the Hindu majority. While Hindu festivals are policed, their traditions scrutinized, and their sentiments mocked, religious minorities , particularly Muslims , are portrayed as perpetual victims, even when elements within their community carry out heinous acts of terror.

Let’s look globally, there are OVER 50 officially Islamic countries in the world. Nations where the law is derived from Sharia, where minorities often live under strict regulations, and where the state proudly proclaims its religious identity. No one questions their right to exist, or tells them to “be more secular.” But when Hindus - who have no other homeland but India - ask for their culture, their faith, and their identity to be protected, they’re labelled as fascists, extremists, or worse.

Why is the idea of a Hindu nation so controversial? Pakistan was literally created on the basis of religion. It exists as an Islamic state. And many who defend Pakistan’s actions today fail to acknowledge its history of genocide against Hindus, Sikhs, and other minorities — not just in 1947, but in the decades that followed, through proxy wars, terrorist attacks, and systematic persecution.

If Muslims around the world have Islamic nations where they can freely practice their religion, enforce their laws, and build their communities, why is it “intolerant” for Hindus to want one country where their values, beliefs, and identity are safeguarded?

It’s not about hate. It’s about survival. It's about dignity. It’s about not having to constantly apologize for being Hindu in the only country on earth where Hinduism was born, nurtured, and sustained.

This doesn’t mean non-Hindus should be expelled or oppressed. It means recognizing that India’s civilizational identity is Hindu, and embracing that, with fairness to all, but special protection to none. Equality doesn’t mean erasure. Tolerance doesn’t mean weakness. And secularism doesn’t mean that Hindus must keep shrinking to make room for those who, in too many cases, don't even respect the land they live in.

So no, wanting India to assert its Hindu roots isn’t unpatriotic. It’s self-respect. It’s justice. And frankly, in a world full of religious nations, it's about time Hindus stopped being ashamed of wanting a nation of their own , a homeland where they are not second-class citizens in the name of “secularism,” but proud inheritors of a great civilization.

No. Chandra isn't a she/they. Hindus have never seen Chandra as a female.

Whoever translated this did a very bad job. I think I did point that out already in one of my previous reblogs.

So no one ever told me about Ram ji roasting the moon and listing it faults because it's just not as beautiful as Maa Sita after looking at her once in the gardens? No one?

And then he just returned to his Guru like nothing happened? As if he didn't just talk to the moon and insult it?

I generally prefer Valmiki Ramayan but the Balkand in Ramcharitmanas is pure gold.

Adding to it

1. Karn was a grown up adult picking fights with literal teenagers. He wasn't some poor guy getting bullied. He was trying to climb the ladder and he knew Dhritarashtra sits on the throne and Duryodhana is the crown prince so he became friends with him instead of the Pandavas. And the result - he was made king of Anga. The same duryodhana who insulted Vidur for being born to a handmaiden bestows an entire kingdom to another low-born man. Isn't that surprising?

2. Eklavya was also a grown up adult. He's Krishna's contemporary not Pandavas'. He was a prince and yes he was also a cousin to Krishna. And Dronacharya was a rajguru. A rajguru is dedicated to teaching the kids of only that particular royal family. Think of Rishi Vashisht being the rajguru for Suryavansh.

3. Vidur was a prime minister to the Kuru kingdom. And later to the Pandavas. Krishna decided to eat and stay at Vidur's home instead of the Kuru palace. Duryodhana insulted Vidur right before the Kurukshetra war and Vidur broke his bow and decided not to side with the Kauravas in the war. Now why would he own a bow? Was he trained in archery? Does that mean he was treated equal to his half brothers? The answer is yes. Oh also he was married to a princess from some unnamed kingdom( or maybe I just don't remember it). Also he left for the forest along with Kunti, Dhritarashtra and Gandhari. Because guess what? he was family.

I would actually like to add here that Vishwamitra was a Kshatriya first and then turned into a rishi, to become a brahmrishi. So yes the caste system was based on karma and not janma like someone mentioned already

One of my favourite things that I came across while reading ancient history is when Varahmir straight up countered Budhhist Sutras’ and Dharmshastras’ claims of women being “seductresses capable of straying learned men” by pointing out “bro. Its you. You’re the one whose looking at her the wrong way. You’re the problem here.”

other Indian states also have catchy phrases for themselves such as "Kerala, gods own country", "Madhya Pradesh, heart of hindustan", "Uttarakhand, land of gods",

literally every other state has areas described as heaven on earth. The elephant in the room is that Kashmiris think they're racially superior for there's an erroneous notion that kashmiris have lighter skin than the rest of Indians, and that they're cleaner (no, kashmiris civic sense is awful, the central government just pumps shit ton of money for their infra)

So the elephant in the room, as we speak, is racial superiority of Kashmiris. Even in arguments, they always love to claim that their ancestors were "pure Brahmins" or "aryans", repeating 19th century European eugenicists racial propaganda. In reality, an impoverished dark skin priest from Kerala (shrautin /agnihotra) is a real Brahmin and not these "Butt, Dar, Mattoos". Surnames are easy to steal which a lot of subcon converts do to "gain legitimacy among converts (or reverts as they love to claim)". Which goes back to racism and racial superiority. Notice how they're dragging West Africans too (they don't do that to East Africa because they perceive east africa as islamic and therefore their ummah perhaps)

Pakistani agitprop accounts are posting random clips of light skin individuals as a part of their longstanding campaign to claim that Indians are dark brown, which connotes to ugly and lesser (in their minds), whereas Pakistanis are light skin, "real aryans" and have closer proximity to MENA and Europeans. Do not come to me with verses from quran claiming that the barbarian prophet "forbade racism" (biggest cock and bull propaganda, along with islam being feminist) when Persians were derogatorily called "Ajam" and "abeed" has an inherent anti-black racist connotation.

The "right to self-determination" -crowd cannot discuss about these things because either they're scared to speak about the truth (they fear that they get ostracised by their peers) or they're just so so brainwashed that they no longer can reason.