not seeing enough posts about how jax literally was correct about how caine isn't gonna do anything even if they misbehave during the adventure
like he very much said nothings gonna happen and he was RIGHT because they all got the same score despite pomni flirting with gummygoo instead of taking the gloink queen's order, ragatha being high, and jax clocking off early and putting ragatha in the frier and saying he hates customers and... everything else he did. meanwhile zooble did their job so well and ALSO got a b+ like everyone else
tldr jax was right that they cant face consequences and the fact hes so confident in that probably makes the fact that hes an asshole make significantly more sense bc he has no reason to stop and also he's right that nothing they do in the circus matters. work hard? b+. get high and stop working to sit on the floor and make everyone elses lives harder? also b+
There is so much to break down here holy shit
First off, I like how Fukuzawa and Mori are the only one fully on different sides here, I think of all the generations of skk they are the ones who simply and truly hate eachother. Everything about them is antithetical, they represent the complete opposite values.
skk here is also interesting, look at chuuyas expression, he has his typical "I hate being here but i have no choice" look that he had as the king of sheep. And Dazai literally leaning over him is pretty spot on for how we see their partnership play out for most of their time in the mafia.
sskk being back to back here I think actually shows their trust in eachother now, Fyodor being a present threat and both of them wathcing eachothers back. There's also the fact that Atsushi is looking up while Akutagawa is looking straight ahead
How did Oda leave such a strong impression on Dazai?
OOHH ok i have a lot of thoughts on this topic so bear with me, this is gonna be a long one My interpretation is the first thing Dazai latched onto about Oda was his honesty.
Oda is a very straightforward person, he rarely ever if at all has an ulterior motive and it totally blindsides Dazai. He can't manipulate Oda because he'll take what he says too literally, he can't predict him - not because Oda is good at hiding his thoughts, he just naturally has the most unreadable resting poker face imaginable - and no matter what he does nothing seems to phase Oda (keyword "seems", it often does he just doesn't show it) , and it intrigues Dazai.
As seen with Chuuya we know Dazai gets hooked on people who surprise and/or impress him, so I can absolutely understand how he saw the enigma that is Oda and said "you're my friend now we're having soft tacos later <3".
I could go on for hours about the various times Oda has bamboozled Dazai and how each effected him profoundly in so many different ways, but that's a discussion for another time. I don't think just these factors would realistically warrant Dazai's drastic change in world outlook and spur on his sudden redemption arc, so what did?
I believe it was his complete lack of judgement. Despite Dazai's constant suicide attempts and harsh view of the world not once did Oda outwardly judge him for it, which is in some ways a blessing and in some ways a curse. Oda never viewed himself as qualified enough to call Dazai out, which in hindsight might've done harm as there were times were Dazai needed someone to call him out, but unbeknownst to Oda that lack of judgement gave Dazai room to breathe.
He saw right past the silly facade and the darker side to Dazai, he saw a "sobbing child abandoned in the darkness of a world far emptier than the one we're seeing", and he saw a friend.
And this is exactly why Oda's last words hit Dazai so hard. Odasaku, who never speaks up for himself, Odasaku, who's so genuine he'd believe a murderer if they simply said "I didn't do it", Odasaku, who is now telling Dazai life might just be little better if he decides to help rather than hurt.
Bleeding out on the floor of a mansion, in a desperate attempt to make up for all the times he didn't confront Dazai Oda has to find some way to get through to him and fast. His harsh words to Dazai on how he'll never find that happiness he so desperately craves are so jarring they snap him out of his panic, suddenly he's blindsided all over again, and that vulnerable state gives Oda's next words the chance to reach deeper - "be on the side that saves people."
In order to truly get through to him, Oda needed to level with Dazai, the only way to do that in such little time was to repeat back to him his own internal mantra of "never filling that hole that is his loneliness". It's clear his words are false, especially the line "nothing beyond your own expectations will happen" as Dazai's entire speech to Fyodor in the prison is about his belief in the unpredictable nature of human beings.
But regardless, that slap in the face of hearing his own self-destructive thoughts voiced aloud after going his entire life without ever considering anybody else could understand them heightened Dazai's faith in Oda's promise of a life that's "a bit more wonderful."
What makes me adore Oda and Dazai's friendship so much is how grounded and natural it feels. Oda isn't some perfect saviour who always knows exactly what to say, far from it, he was a 23 year old PM grunt with 5 kids and a love for spicy curry, but that's all he needed to be.
Sorry this is so ramble-y and long winded if you couldn't tell already Oda's my favourite character so I have a lot to say about him đ Thank you so much for the ask!!!
Love my two clowns đ¤Ąđ
SIBLING SHENANIGANS!!!!!
a silly man with no thoughts in his eyes other than to watch Chuuya every day
Cheng Xiaoshi's Death Analysis â PART 1: Cheng Xiaoshi's Character Analysis
Why is Lu Guang so desperate to save him? Let's analyze!
letâs begin with the part where Cheng Xiaoshi is informed by the officer that Lu Guangâs rescue failed, he died.
(now this will be a bit long since i'll be contrasting their personalities, so please bear with me. if you want me to get to the point then skip to part 3)
Cheng Xiaoshi, after breaking down in tears, seemed to have been struck by the same exact idea as that of Lu Guang â to go back in time and save him.
However, the difference between Lu Guang and Cheng Xiaoshi in this case (where the thought processed was awfully similar) is that Cheng Xiaoshi did not execute this plan/idea of his.
I know youâre aware of all what Iâm saying right now but hear me outâŚ
isnât it very odd?
now Iâm sure you guys might say/think: âwe already know that.â âthatâs because theyâre so attached to each other!â âLink Click is full of plot twists! So itâs not odd for them to surprise us!â âLu Guangâs got feelings too yâknow?!â âMaybe Lu Guang really just does care.â
Wait. Listen.
Iâm not trying to imply that Lu Guang doesnât have feelings, that he doesnât have a heart â of course he does, heâs a human. But compared to Cheng Xiaoshi, heâs less emotional.
Cheng Xiaoshi is known to be the more sentimental, sensitive, and selfless one of the two. He usually allows his emotions to control him. He wears his heart on his sleeve. (at least that's what the donghua shows us)
But, somehow, he was able to restrain himself from letting his emotions take over him and dive back in time (all because a glimpse of Lu Guang, reciting the rule, flashed before his eyes)
He, Cheng Xiaoshi, the so very attached to Lu Guang Cheng Xiaoshi, was able to restrain.
And please do keep in mind that the emotions he experienced when he discovered Lu Guangâs death must have been unbelievably strong and unbearable; overwhelming beyond words because itâs like losing a source of happiness in your life.
He must have been so scared because heâs already experienced the horror of being abandoned by the most valuable people in his life such as his very own parents â and I bet he doesnât wanna re-experience it.
Despite all that, he was able to restrain.
But Lu Guang couldnât.
[keep in mind that these are just mere conclusions drawn from close observations, assumptions, and theories. i can be wrong too since sgdlr loves surprising us with plot twists! so feel free to express your opinion in the comments!]
So, I finally read Bungou Stray Dogs. And yâall, I freaking love this manga. Itâs got themes of life, grief, death, trauma, and is chock-full of literary references and puns.Â
Shocking no one, one of my favorite charactersâthe reason I started reading the storyâis Dostoyevsky, since Iâm⌠rather an admitted fangirl of Dostoyevskyâs novels. Iâve reread each of them at least twice and some (C&P) up to five times. Clearly BSDâs Dostoyevsky not the hopeful, faithful author, but heâs definitely a fascinating antagonist whose arc is digging into the themes of Dostoyevsky the writerâs novelsâwith a particular focus on the two novels that are my very favorite novels ever written, by anyone, in history: Crime and Punishment and Demons.Â
But in truth, it draws more from Demons than from Crime and Punishment, right down to having BSD!Dostoyevsky directly quote it.
Demons is far, far less popular that Crime and Punishment, The Brothers Karamazov, and even The Idiot, so I was really surprised to see how often itâs been referenced in BSD (The reason itâs less popular is honestly justified: the first 100 pages are paced⌠horribly, but the rest of the novel is so powerful that I can overlook that). Itâs been translated under a variety of titles as well: The Possessed, The Devils, and the most recent is Demons so thatâs what weâre going with in this meta.
Pssstâlook at how often BSD!Dostoyesvky is associated with demons or devils:
Yet Demons has been popular with literary theorists (one well-known critic has described it as containing âthe most harrowing scene in all of fiction,â an assessment Iâd agree withâand this is the scene Iâm going to discuss in detail) and existentialists like Camus (sorry Camus). Anyways, I have a soft spot for Demons because it contains my very favorite character in existence: Alexei Nilyich Kirillov, who is the character BSD!Dostoyesvky directly quotes.
@blackandwhitemusician did a great analysis of the similar philosophies BSD!Dostoyevsky shares with Crime and Punishmentâs Raskolnikov, but I want to talk about how BSD!Dostoyevsky is also modeled after Kirillovâs philosophical ideas. This isnât to say he embodies them, because Kirillov is decidedly not a villain unlike BSD!Dostoyevsky, but BSD!Dostoyevsky definitely draws heavily from Kirillovâs ideals.
Kirillov is a character who, like Raskolnikov, embodies the contradictions of human nature, but in a hyperbolic way. Heâs noted to have a âcalm but warm and kindly expression"and adores children, playing with them, and he even helps his friend Shatovâs wife give birth (heâs endearingly awkward and scared for the whole ordeal). He affirms that he is âfond of lifeâ and yet he is determined, from the moment we meet him, to shoot himself as suicide because in doing so he will save himself and the world.Â
Kirillovâs reasoning is complex and at the same time, spotty, and stems from a deep despair and disgust with human sin. Sound familiar?
Time is also a major motif with BSD! Dostoyevsky and with Kirilllov. He does not believe in time as more than an âidea.â He insists that âlife exists, but death doesnât at all⌠[I believe] in eternal life here. There are moments, you reach moments, and time suddenly stands still, and it will become eternal.â
(Clocks constantly appear in BS chapter 42, Dostoyevskyâs introduction, as well.)
Kirillov also draws from other philosophies such as Descartesâ âI think, therefore I am,â affirming that âman is unhappy because he doesnât know heâs happy⌠If they knew that it was good for them, it would be good for them, but as long as they donât know itâs good for them, it will be bad for them. Thatâs the whole idea, the whole of it⌠Theyâll find out that theyâre good and theyâll all become good, every one of them.â
In other words, reality is what Kirillov makes of it in his own mind, which is what BSD!Dostoyevsky hints his ability is (but it isnât).
Itâs still a belief BSD!Dostoyevsky holds: that his beliefs create reality.
Kirillov muses, in conversation with his friend Stavrogin (bold is Kirillov):
âHe who teaches that all are good will end the world.â
âHe who taught it was crucified.â
âHe will come, and his name will be the man-god.â
âThe god-man?â
âThe man-god. Thatâs the difference.â
In BSD, anything written in The Book becomes truth, and Dostoyevsky plans to use it to rid the world of the sins of ability-users. Similarly, Kirillov plans to use his decision to set people free, and Pyotr plans to use Kirillovâs mental instability and philosophical suicide to erase consequences for his own sins. And as Kirillov also believes this will make moments heaven, Dostoyevsky expresses (using religious language) that this will make a heavenly reality as well:
As Demons goes on, we find out that Pyotr Stepanovich had struck a deal with Kirillov. Since Kirillov really tries to believe that everyone and everything is good, when Pyotr asks him to kill himself and write a note specifying something Pyotr wonât specify until the time comes, to help Pyotr, Kirillov agrees. Pyotr notes that he doesnât tell Kirillov what he plansâto have Kirillov take the blame for the murder of their mutual friend Shatov, which Pyotr commitsâbecause he thinks that if Kirillov knows in advance, âKirillov could not be relied upon.â
The irony, of course, is that by seeking to prove the ultimate will in the universe is of the individual, that the individual is his/her own god, Kirillov becomes an unwitting tool in Pyotr Stepanovichâs terrible plots. He contributes to the unjust death of someone he cares deeply for by taking the blame. And Kirillov did not want this at all. When Pyotr comes to collect, he realizes what heâs done (bold is Kirillov_:
âHe is dead!â cried Kirillov, jumping up from the sofa.
âHe died at seven oâclock this evening, or rather, at seven oâclock yesterday evening, and now itâs one oâclock.â
âYou have killed him!â
âŚ
âYou are a strange man, though, Kirillov; you knew yourself that the stupid fellow was bound to end like this. What was there to foresee in that? I made that as plain as possible over and over again. Shatov was meaning to betray us; I was watching him, and it could not be left like that. And you too had instructions to watch him; you told me so yourself three weeks ago.âŚâ
âŚ
âI wonât write that I killed Shatov ⌠and I wonât write anything now. You wonât have a document!â
Pyotr refuses to leave until Kirillov is dead, and Kirillov explains that âI wonât put it off; I want to kill myself now: all are scoundrels.â The exact opposite of what he expressed before about things being good.
âHeâs guessed the truth at last! Can you, Kirillov, with your sense, have failed to see till now that all men are alike, that there are none better or worse, only some are stupider, than others, and that if all are scoundrels (which is nonsense, though) there oughtnât to be any people that are not?â
And then we see what motivates Kirillov is a desperate need to have a reason to match his desire to live. Itâs literally one of the main themes of Bungo Stray Dogs (bold is Kirillov):
 âIf you stopped yourself, you become God; thatâs it, isnât it?â
âYes, I become God.â
âŚ
âLet it be comfort. God is necessary and so must exist⌠But I know He doesnât and canât⌠Surely you must understand that a man with two such ideas canât go on living?â
And of course, this is BSD!âs Dostoyevsky in what I am betting is a direct quote from Demons as translated into Japanese: If god does not exist, then I am god.
His man-god belief, like Dostoyevskyâs in BSD, are explained thusly (bold is Kirillov):
âIâve always been surprised at every oneâs going on living,â said Kirillov, not hearing his remark.
âŚ
âHold your tongue; you wonât understand anything. If there is no God, then I am God.â
âThere, I could never understand that point of yours: why are you God?â
âIf God exists, all is His will and from His will I cannot escape. If not, itâs all my will and I am bound to show self-will.â
âSelf-will? But why are you bound?â
âBecause all will has become mine. Can it be that no one in the whole planet, after making an end of God and believing in his own will, will dare to express his self-will on the most vital point? Itâs like a beggar inheriting a fortune and being afraid of it and not daring to approach the bag of gold, thinking himself too weak to own it. I want to manifest my self-will. I may be the only one, but Iâll do it.â
Thatâs a direct quote.
BSD!Dostoyevsky manipulates human will to lead people into committing suicide, and is killing them to create a new world without the sins of ability-users:
Kirillov says this right before he finally writes the false confession to Stavroginâs murder and kills himself:
âMan has done nothing but invent God so as to go on living, and not kill himself; thatâs the whole of universal history up till now. I am the first one in the whole history of mankind who would not invent God. Let them know it once for allâŚ
âI am awfully unhappy, for Iâm awfully afraid. Terror is the curse of man.⌠But I will assert my will, I am bound to believe that I donât believe. I will begin and will make an end of it and open the door, and will save. Thatâs the only thing that will save mankind and will re-create the next generation physically; for with his present physical nature man canât get on without his former God, I believe. For three years Iâve been seeking for the attribute of my godhead and Iâve found it; the attribute of my godhead is self-will! Thatâs all I can do to prove in the highest point my independence and my new terrible freedom. For it is very terrible. I am killing myself to prove my independence and my new terrible freedom.â
Yet Kirillov is inventing god: himself. He signs the paper and then does kill himself, but itâs not without the last terrible, terrifying realization that he does not want to die. He wants to live. And he fights Pyotr, biting his finger nearly off, before committing suicide. But Kirillov, as wrong and tragic as his philosophy is, is the one who recognizes the theme of Demons.
âStavrogin, too, is consumed by an idea,â Kirillov said gloomily, pacing up and down the room.
The point of the entire tragedy in Demons is basically if you are consumed by an idea, it will turn you into a devil. Kirillov is, along with Shatov, perhaps the most likeable main character in Demons (others are far more horrifying as their various political, religious, and philosophical ideas take them over). And so is Dostoyevsky in BSD: consumed by his ideas, convinced his will is all that matters.
It wonât end well.
ok so... there's this new thing that I'm hyperfixating on because of course I am, why would I ever like and enjoy something a normal amount?? Absolutely preposterous!!!!
(if they look weird I'm sorry, I'm still figuring out how to draw them)
I have some opinions on this official art
I saw it brought up quite a lot when Dazai âdiedâ last year but now that kunikida is âdeadâ (no I wonât admit he is dead without more proof, I learned my lesson) itâs being brought up a lot more. I feel like it doesnât quite fit that this is the forshadowing for either Dazai or kunikida a âdeathâ bc both of them were at the hands of Fyodor. And based on my perception of the story, the port mafia is not really teaming up with Fyodor. I mean they were against them during the Canibalism arc and I donât think Mori took very kindly to being almost murdered.
Poor quality doodles because art block is strong but SNUFKIN GAME