What's distressing, but also important to understand, about JK Rowling hitting the "Denying trans people were targeted in the Holocaust" point is that it's kind of the last stop before she just goes full alt-right weirdo.
Joanne is denying the Holocaust (if a group was targeted, denying they were targeted is Holocaust denial) and that's going to lead to pushback from historians and experts. But Joanne is too deep in to believe what anyone who disagrees with her says, so she's just going to dismiss what those historians and experts tell her. And once she's disbelieving them about that one thing, well it's just a tiny step to start disbelieving them about other things.
This isn't by accident either, transphobic circles are swarming with far right agitators, ready to use hatred of trans people as an in to recruit people into their causes. They have handbooks for this sort of thing and they are, unfortunately, good at it. I suspect Joanne will be spouting coded versions of Great Replacement stuff by the end of the summer.
This is not a plea to try and pull Joanne out. She's too deep in, and even if she wasn't, she's already demonstrated an inability to examine her own prejudices, an unwillingness to hear criticism and a weakness to flattery. She is perfect recruitment bait for people who know what they're doing, and my impression is she's surrounded herself with people like that.
No, this is to understand two things: First is to use her as an example, to understand how a well meaning liberal can chase their own prejudices down a very dark rabbit hole. We are none of us immune to propaganda and even if we can't change what's happened to her, we can at least use it to protect ourselves.
And second is to understand that one of the main reasons you can't pull Joanne out of the transphobic pipeline is cause she is the pipeline now. She is the transphobic banner bearer now, she is funneling money and attention to these groups, she is their most famous celebrity and she is helping recruit people. Being able to show people how far she's gone, how deep into the right wing rabbit hole she's going, is important to help other people who still think she just "Had some concerns" know where her path leads.
iskall :(
I have seen more negativity in Iskall's chat today than I have ever seen in any hermit's stream. I don't know who these people are or why the heck they're here but holy crap if you don't enjoy someone's content, don't hang out in their stream???
Love the puns from Pun Hub
some of my friends are being shitty and toxic but I'm in your mind fuzz is pretty chill and weirdly nostalgic rn
To my uk trans people and allies out there.
As a general rule, don't trust anyone who identifies as a "normal person".
whats stopping me from just going on a long walk with some water colors and painting landscapes near my neighborhood. i have free will
TW: mentioning anti trans sentiment
The government has redefined extremism:
“Extremism is the promotion or advancement of an ideology based on violence, hatred or intolerance, that aims to: 1 negate or destroy the fundamental rights and freedoms of others; or 2 undermine, overturn or replace the UK’s system of liberal parliamentary democracy and democratic rights; or 3 intentionally create a permissive environment for others to achieve the results in (1) or (2).”
But has also said terfs (gEndeR CriTiCal) do not fall under this definition.
How is that not violent, hatred, intolerance, aiming to destroy the fundamental rights and freedoms of others???
fucking despicable
laughable that the tories often fit their own definition of extremists
and also laughable that they say that it's a "more precise definition" even though it's incredibly vague compared to the existing definition
I want to set something on fire peacefully make my views known aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
I don't care what your perception of the female body has been warped into by the media and advertising prevalent in culture. eat some goddamn carbs