I Just Read A Re-post Of One Of My Post From A Non-gaylor, And I Would Like To Say It Was A Really Good,

I might or might not be crying right now.

"do you seriously think you're above the rules" the stupid ones yeah

Every single person deserves shelter, food, water, and healthcare.

Of course Taylor Swift is straight. Is totally straight to dress up as Sappho and hide in a glass closet to sing in the MV of the first track of your really queer album where you sing "thats my man" so many times that is just campy and ridculous considering how queercoded that lyrics are. Those gaylors are just taking it too far.

So, aparently and according to Closer, Travis is having doubts about Taylor and their relationship. The articule says he still loves her but the public talking about how they may be pr and the rumour about her marriage with Joe (that is confirmed by Tree Pain to not be true) are messing with him.

The articule is very detailed, almost as if they read the mind of Kelce, and I cannot help but ask, how would they know? What I am trying to say is, this really looks like they are trying to craft a narrative around their relationships. The magazine is most likely not making that up, but been told by sources from Taylor and Travis team.

This is all really campy and reminds me of the Tom Hiddleston pre-reputation pr stunt, and it completely makes sense for them to do that.

If we take a closer look to Taylors public persona during the re recording era, she really tried and recreate her public dating life for the time of the albums original release when the re recording was going to be released. Previously to Speak Now TV she dated Matty Healy, a really cuestionable guy that swifties dont like. Pre 1989TV release she started being a lot more public with friends and starting dating Kalce out of the blue, which really draws paralels to her girlsquad and her relationship with Harry Styles or Calvin Harris, I am not really sure which one she might be recreating (and maybe Kelce is the mix of both Styles and Harris).

Now, in the pre reputation era, and if this pattern is not me reading a lot into her every move, it makes a lot of sense that Kelce has now gone from the character of Styles/Harris of 1989 to the Tom Hiddleston of reputation, all public and unashamed.

I dont know where she is going with all this public performances she is making, and maybe Travlor is a real, genuine, happy relationship (which good for her because everyone deserves true, happy, genuine love) but that is my take on it.

lesbians love and support our trans sisters 💖💖

Sooo, I just read a post saying that gaylors are disgusting because they want to force Taylor out of the closet?? And that NYT should not have posted that article???

Let me get something clear, if you are closeted, you try and hide your queernes as much as you can. You dont go around singing about your agumentative, antithetical dream girl and wearing someone like a necklace. You dont talk about hairpin drops. You dont dress yourself in the bi pride flag colors and sing about wanting boys and girls. Is not something you do if you are closeted.

Forcing someone out of the closet is disgunting, thats for sure, the thing were this person is wrong is that we are not trying to force Taylor out of the closet. Forcing her would be something she does not agree on but since she has been putting all the queercoding and queer slang in her music (out there to listen and analize by everyone) and decide to do some things queer people use to identify each other and send signals in public, aware she is being watched by the whole world, I would argue that the talking about her probably being queer is consented by her.

Also, saying she is in a closet would mean she is secretive about it and trying to pass as straight, which I think I gave you enough examples as to why she is not secretive about it. Is out there to see. And because is out there to see, it is okay to talk about it. She put it out there. The NYT only talked about queercoding in her music, which is completely fine to talk to. She wrote that music and she released it. She filmed that videos. Chose that words. She is in control and she decided to leave hairpin drops as often as she could. The NYT was not outing her or anything, it was just doing a reading of a piece of art using certain simbology, that happens to be the queer one. And if we think about how the art and the artist are connected, is fair enough to wonder if she could be attracted to woman. She hints at it in her music!

Reblog if you think it’s okay to platonically say “I Love You” to your friends

Wanted To Share My Favorite Taylor Swift Songs As Quotes: My Interpretation

Dancing with our hands tied

King of my heart

Ivy

Willow

London Boy

Betty

Delicate

False God

Vigilante sh$t

Lover

I am indeed a coward, but this blog is a safe space for asexuals (everyone on that spectrum) and hate coments towards them (or anyone for that matter) will not be tolerated.

Please, spread kindness

Reblog if you support asexuals and aren’t a COWARD

RB if your blog is a safe, accepting space for asexuals!