The Age Old Struggle:

The Age Old Struggle:

The Age Old Struggle:

Tried making a comic strip for the first time and had allot of fun with it. I hope to make some sort of sequel or extension to this in the future when I have the time.

More Posts from Arcsonara and Others

1 year ago
Forgot To Post These With The Others So Here We Go.

Forgot to post these with the others so here we go.


Tags
4 months ago

Ice slippery

Ice Slippery
11 months ago
Another Rambley Drawing For Today!

Another Rambley drawing for today!

Going for nearly two years without creative inspiration and then having it surge all of a sudden has been weird. I'm trying to hold back from doing too much and exhausting myself again.


Tags
1 year ago
WIP Of A Character Who's Been Bouncing Around In My Head For Ages That I've Finally Worked Up The Courage

WIP of a character who's been bouncing around in my head for ages that I've finally worked up the courage to try and bring to life.


Tags
4 months ago

I feel like we need a refresher on Watsonian vs Doylist perspectives in media analysis. When you have a question about a piece of media - about a potential plot hole or error, about a dubious costuming decision, about a character suddenly acting out of character -

A Watsonian answer is one that positions itself within the fictional world.

A Doylist answer is one that positions itself within the real world.

Meaning: if Watson says something that isn't true, one explanation is that Watson made a mistake. Another explanation is that Sir Arthur Conan Doyle made a mistake.

Watsonian explanations are implicitly charitable. You are implicitly buying into the notion that there is a good in-world reason for what you're seeing on screen or on the page. ("The bunny girls in Final Fantasy wear lingerie all the time because they're from a desert culture!")

Doylist explanations are pragmatic. You are acknowledging that the fiction is shaped by real-world forces, like the creators' personal taste, their biases, the pressures they might be under from managers or editors, or the limits of their expertise. ("The bunny girls in Final Fantasy wear lingerie because somebody thought they'd sell more units that way.")

Watsonian explanations tend to be imaginative but naive. Seeking a Watsonian explanation for a problem within a narrative is inherently pleasure-seeking: you don't want your suspension of disbelief to be broken, and you're willing to put in the leg work to prevent it. Looking for a Watsonian answer can make for a fun game! But it can quickly stray into making excuses for lazy or biased storytelling, or cynical and greedy executives.

Doylist explanations are very often accurate, but they're not much fun. They should supersede efforts to provide a Watsonian explanation where actual harm is being done: "This character is being depicted in a racist way because the creators have a racist bias.'" Or: "The lore changed because management fired all of the writers from last season because they didn't want to pay then residuals."

Doylism also runs the risk of becoming trite, when applied to lower stakes discrepancies. Yes, it's possible that this character acted strangely in this episode because this episode had a different writer, but that isn't interesting, and it terminates conversation.

I think a lot of conversations about media would go a lot more smoothly, and everyone would have a lot more fun, if people were just clearer about whether they are looking to engage in Watsonian or Doylist analysis. How many arguments could be prevented by just saying, "No, Doylist you're probably right, but it's more fun to imagine there's a Watsonian reason for this, so that's what I'm doing." Or, "From a Watsonian POV that explanation makes sense, but I'm going with the Doylist view here because the creator's intentions leave a bad taste in my mouth that I can't ignore."

Idk, just keep those terms in your pocket? And if you start to get mad at somebody for their analysis, take a second to see if what they're saying makes more sense from the other side of the Watsonian/Doylist divide.

1 year ago
Fun Fact: I Emit Stars When Shaken!

Fun Fact: I emit stars when shaken!

Tumblr Is Shit For Artists But I’m Really Bullheaded And I Don’t Want To Move
Tumblr Is Shit For Artists But I’m Really Bullheaded And I Don’t Want To Move

Tumblr is shit for artists but I’m really bullheaded and I don’t want to move


Tags
5 months ago

Fandom is so different now and it’s becoming un-fun with how quickly shit moves.

I just want to enjoy things. I don’t want to have to play a game of Artist-Race that seems to be afoot lately.

Ya’ll eat up fandoms, leave artists and writers bone dry and then move on so fucking quickly then fucking wonder where all the Good Fandom Stuff is.

Idk Maybe cherish some things for longer. Reblog stuff. Interact with people. Comment and share.

Fandom is Capitalism now and I’m not being nuanced.

Loading...
End of content
No more pages to load
  • arcsonara
    arcsonara reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • pielove123clan
    pielove123clan reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • pielove123clan
    pielove123clan liked this · 1 year ago
  • gummycryptidblog
    gummycryptidblog liked this · 1 year ago
  • blueberrybanana15
    blueberrybanana15 reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • blueberrybanana15
    blueberrybanana15 liked this · 1 year ago
  • cheesecakegardener
    cheesecakegardener liked this · 1 year ago
  • cidiper
    cidiper reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • cidiper
    cidiper liked this · 1 year ago
  • arcsonara
    arcsonara reblogged this · 1 year ago
arcsonara - Just another tired artist
Just another tired artist

YouTube, Bluesky & Cara - @Arcsonara

84 posts

Explore Tumblr Blog
Search Through Tumblr Tags